Tandridge District Council
Tree
There is a problem
- 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order
Concord Paynesfield Road Tatsfield (now no 70)
- reference
- 65/GOD T1
- name
- Concord Paynesfield Road Tatsfield (now no 70)
- tree-preservation-order
- 65/GOD
- uprn
- address-text
- Concord Paynesfield Road Tatsfield (now no 70)
- point
- POINT (0.030750 51.297750)
- geometry
- MULTIPOLYGON (((0.030750 51.297764,0.030724 51.297754,0.030721 51.297743,0.030729 51.297733,0.030756 51.297728,0.030774 51.297736,0.030774 51.297756,0.030750 51.297764)))
- notes
- organisation
- felled-date
- entry-date
- 1970-01-02
- start-date
- 1970-01-02
- end-date
How to fix this issue
Your dataset is missing the tree-preservation-order column.
The Tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:
tree-preservation-order
The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.
Example: TPO1
How to improve Tandridge District Council’s data
- Fix the errors indicated
- Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
- Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL